Skip to main content
Loading market data...
‘You have to be serious’: Macron criticises Trump’s mixed messages about Nato and Iran · Starmer calls on Reform to sack Simon Dudley after ‘everyone dies’ Grenfell comments · ‘Weak and pathetic’: why is the EU not using its leverage to stop Israel? · One killed and buildings damaged as magnitude 7.4 earthquake strikes Indonesia · Ukraine war briefing: Russia responds to Zelenskyy’s Easter truce offer with drone attack · Unregulated chatbots are putting lives at risk · AOC vows to block future US military aid to Israel, including for defensive systems · Republican senators McConnell and Tillis break with Trump on Nato withdrawal · UK food inflation ‘could hit 9%’, trade body warns as Reeves meets retail chiefs · SpaceX confidentially files to go public at $1.75tn, reports say · Three hospital doctors’ groups threaten to coordinate strike action in England · ‘Overwhelmed’ Prevent at risk of missing threats as referrals rise, UK counter-terror chief says · ‘People need hope’: Greens court voters in battle for north-east council seats · Your Party to focus local election efforts on backing independent candidates · ‘Payment expected within seven days’: New Zealand doctor invoices US embassy for rising petrol costs · ‘You have to be serious’: Macron criticises Trump’s mixed messages about Nato and Iran · Starmer calls on Reform to sack Simon Dudley after ‘everyone dies’ Grenfell comments · ‘Weak and pathetic’: why is the EU not using its leverage to stop Israel? · One killed and buildings damaged as magnitude 7.4 earthquake strikes Indonesia · Ukraine war briefing: Russia responds to Zelenskyy’s Easter truce offer with drone attack · Unregulated chatbots are putting lives at risk · AOC vows to block future US military aid to Israel, including for defensive systems · Republican senators McConnell and Tillis break with Trump on Nato withdrawal · UK food inflation ‘could hit 9%’, trade body warns as Reeves meets retail chiefs · SpaceX confidentially files to go public at $1.75tn, reports say · Three hospital doctors’ groups threaten to coordinate strike action in England · ‘Overwhelmed’ Prevent at risk of missing threats as referrals rise, UK counter-terror chief says · ‘People need hope’: Greens court voters in battle for north-east council seats · Your Party to focus local election efforts on backing independent candidates · ‘Payment expected within seven days’: New Zealand doctor invoices US embassy for rising petrol costs
Investigation

Track children’s experiences to reform family court system

Letter: Karen Pine says now-grown children could be asked to evaluate their experiences retrospectively to improve outcomes

Guardian
Guardian

March 26, 2026 · 1 min read

Share
Track children’s experiences to reform family court system

Track children’s experiences to reform family court system

In response to the article on family court experiences for women and children (Family courts in England and Wales ‘not good enough’ for women and children, minister says, 22 March), the key to measuring the success or otherwise of reforms should be tracking children over the long term, focusing on their lived experience rather than the legal outcomes.

If the now-grown children were asked to evaluate their experiences retrospectively, it would provide actual evidence. Currently, there’s a feedback loop, with professionals in the system effectively evaluating themselves.

There is a systemic problem in the family courts whereby parents with narcissistic or other personality disorders are not being recognised as abusive and allowed to repeatedly seek control of the other parent or the children, either by seeking to have the child live with them or in other ways.

In some cases, they succeed in gaining control by making false allegations to professionals, or by co-opting the child’s sympathies through guilt and manipulation. Children’s voices should absolutely be listened to, but with the caveat that professionals need to be trained to understand power imbalances and the patterns of behaviour that reveal a protective parent versus a coercive one.

Currently, the system tends to treat parents equally in the name of fairness rather than supporting the weaker, manipulated or abused party. Without studies reflecting the long-term experiences of the children, outcomes are unlikely to improve.Karen PineRhyl, Denbighshire

• Have an opinion on anything you’ve read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.

Tagslaw